reasoning on several plans

Should you reassess shoreline development?

Need to define new strategies in reasoning on several plans. First put beside threatened heritage - farmland, constructibles areas, homes - value and the cost of protection structures to achieve. Plaintext, is it better to compensate or reinforce dikes? We also know what is socially acceptable. Finally, we also accept the fact that, from an ecological point of view, let streams is positive. Intensively exploited cereal boxes have been earned on sea, resulting in a loss of soil quality. France has been accused by Brussels to drain too.
What can the mayors?

For years, State, within the framework of the PPRI, urges them to apply certain constraints in areas at risk. It is not easy for them to accept mayors because it impacts the value of the goods. But there is a new awareness. The concept of strategic retreat to the sea, beyond band of 100 meters from the law coastline, emerges. The question is put in several towns, the Hourdel, in the Pas-de-Calais, Rochefort and in the same Department of Charente Maritime, just be a disaster. It must manage and accept the strategic retreat.